Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed

Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed

Blog Article

I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was producing more pressure and was slower than the previous stuff. I do not recall if I even tried using normal h4831 or not; I'm contemplating not.

They can be a similar thing, but H4831 sc is Slash shorter so it'll pack right into a scenario simpler then the traditional, and in some cases like our 7mm rem mag it will allow us to include much more powder then just the traditional H4831.

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo creates .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps outside of a 26" barrel. I take advantage of this same powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr capsules, so It really is awesome to get 1 powder for equally.

243, and a number of the loads I've started with consist of, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am likely to shoot the IMR7828 loads to start with, followed by the W780 loads just so there won't be any surprises if the H-4831sc loads exhibit a shotgun pattern! Who is familiar with, I just may locate a use for it In fact.

In any case, I realized The 2 lbs . of H4831SC made use of the same data, but I did not know regardless of whether there was anything different involving a pound of h4831sc powder labeled "Extreme" and a person not so labeled. A get in touch with to Hodgdon confirmed they were in truth equivalent and the only variance was The emblem on the label.

Any load data to assist that? My initially believed is it's not going to burn many of the way and velocities will be sluggish and everywhere. Might be a pleasant fireworks display!

Nampa, Idaho In my knowledge the only real genuine distinction is that the shortcut meters much better via reloading gear. As soon as It is loaded theres no functional difference. I have read which the shortcut can have a little bit more quickly burn rate but It appears insignificant.

excaliber said: I've found the exact reverse to generally be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally accurate powder in my 300 Gain Mag.

WA I might advise a slower burner that h4831sc can give far better scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you're loading heavies extensive.

You could have to help make a handful of more posts to obtain cleared to perform PM's. As soon as you get to that position I would publish from the labeled reloading area to discover if everyone is near you for a trade. Simply click to broaden...

Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, they're entirely different powders, with IMR 4831 being significantly more rapidly as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Never treat them as precisely the same powder, as they most absolutely will not be.

Again to old site Close If there is something with your cart, it won't be introduced above for the previous web page.

You could either: one) Keep on and possess h4831sc load data the items mentioned underneath automatically removed from your shopping cart:

If I have a pound or two of the powder and obtain additional of precisely the same, only a different whole lot quantity, I will combine all of them up in order that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.